During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
據澳洲當地媒體和BBC取得的電子郵件顯示，神韻藝術團的表演者收到威脅，要求他們取消即將在澳洲舉行的演出，否則將在位於首都的安東尼·阿爾巴尼斯（Anthony Albanese）總理官邸引爆炸藥。
。业内人士推荐夫子作为进阶阅读
Фото: Yan Dorbronosov / Reuters。旺商聊官方下载对此有专业解读
Что думаешь? Оцени!